Sunshine Ordinance Task Force (SOTF)
This webpage is an ongoing open source project. If you have corrections or additions please e-mail info@sfneighborhoods.net Thank You.If you do not live in a city or county with a Sunshine Ordinance or an administrative remedy like a Task Force, you will have to take your complaint to your county superior court. The courts ask that you exhaust all administrative complaint procedures before your bring a complaint to the courts.
This webpage is based on the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance Task Force.
ALL RECORDS SENT TO SOTF ARE PUBLIC AND CAN BE REQUESTED OR SEEN BY ANYONE.
Index
California Public Access Laws that the SOTF Considers
Composition of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force and Supporting Members
Communicating with SOTF
Preparing a Complaint
Complaint Filing
You can File a Complaint Anonymously
Being Anonymous During a Hearing
Number of Complaints that can be Filed
SOTF’s Complaint Procedures can be found here
What is Required for a SOTF Complaint?
Complaint Forms
SOTF “P numbers”
How and Where to File a SOTF Complaint
Being Anonymous During a Hearing
Number of Complaints that can be Filed
SOTF’s Complaint Procedures can be found here
What is Required for a SOTF Complaint?
Complaint Forms
SOTF “P numbers”
How and Where to File a SOTF Complaint
Procedures Before a SOTF Hearing
Before the SOTF Hearings
Agendas/Submission of New Information
Petitioner/Complainant Representation
Petitioner/Complainant Presence at Hearings
Dress Code for a SOTF Hearing
Conduct at SOTF Hearing (SOTF Bylaws and Complaint Procedures)
Scheduling of Complaints at Hearings
Initial 3 person SOTF Committee Hearing
Agenda for SOTF Committees or Full SOTF Agenda - Accessing all Records that have been Submitted for a Complaint including the Respondent
Petitioner/Complainant Representation
Petitioner/Complainant Presence at Hearings
Dress Code for a SOTF Hearing
Conduct at SOTF Hearing (SOTF Bylaws and Complaint Procedures)
Scheduling of Complaints at Hearings
Initial 3 person SOTF Committee Hearing
Agenda for SOTF Committees or Full SOTF Agenda - Accessing all Records that have been Submitted for a Complaint including the Respondent
Participating in Hearings in Person or via Phone
Hearings
Complaint Comment and Deliberation Procedures for SOTF Committees and full SOTF hearings
Tactics
Vote to Pass a Motion
Order of Determination
If the SOTF Motion Passes in Favor of the Complainant, (Violation Found)
If the SOTF Motion is Unfavorable to the Complainant, (Violation Not Found or No Motion)
Tactics
Vote to Pass a Motion
Order of Determination
If the SOTF Motion Passes in Favor of the Complainant, (Violation Found)
If the SOTF Motion is Unfavorable to the Complainant, (Violation Not Found or No Motion)
Reconsideration of Task Force Findings (Appeal)
Taking Your Complaint to Your County Superior Court
Jurisdiction
Knowledgeable Respondent (Oath)
Sunshine Ordinance Task Force Authority Under the Sunshine Ordinance (SFSO § 67.21(e), 67.30 (c)) and San Francisco Administrative Code 12L.5
Picture of Hearing Room
SOTF Committees
SOTF Standing Committees
Rules Committee
Education, Outreach, and Training Committee
Complaint Committee
Compliance & Amendments Committee
Special or Ad Hoc CommitteesEducation, Outreach, and Training Committee
Complaint Committee
Compliance & Amendments Committee
Sunshine Ordinance Task Force Audio/Transcripts
How to use YouTube Transcript
SOTF and SOTF Committee Hearing YouTube Links
SOTF and SOTF Committee Hearing YouTube Links
SOTF and SOTF Committee Hearing YouTube Links
Index to Committee and Year:
Full SOTF: 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
Complaint Committee: 2024 | 2023 | 2022
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
Compliance & Amendment Committee: 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
Education, Outreach & Training Committee: 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
Rules Committee: 2022 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2011 | 2009
Information Technology Committee: 2022 | 2019 | 2017 | 2012
Index to Committee and Year:
Full SOTF: 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
Complaint Committee: 2024 | 2023 | 2022
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
Compliance & Amendment Committee: 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
Education, Outreach & Training Committee: 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
Rules Committee: 2022 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2011 | 2009
Information Technology Committee: 2022 | 2019 | 2017 | 2012
California Public Access Laws that the SOTF Considers
San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance, California Public Records Act, the Ralph M. Brown Act and San Francisco Administrative Code. 12L.5. (certain non-profits) applying to local agencies, public officials, departments, commissions, committees, task forces, entities and non-profits in the city and county of San Francisco as defined in the previously mention public access laws. (also see jurisdiction on this webpage)TOP
Composition of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force and Supporting Members
The Sunshine Ordinance Task Force (SOTF) is a 11 member (voting) task force of the city of San Francisco. It is made up of volunteers.The Mayor can have a non-voting task force member representative at hearings. (Rare)
The Clerk of the Board of Supervisors can be there as or a designated representative, non-voting. SFSO § 67.30. and 67.31(see below). This is known as the SOTF Administrator. People filing a complaint will have interactions with this person.
The City Attorney’s Office assigns an attorney as a legal advisor to SOTF who has experience with public access laws. There is an “ethical wall” around this attorney “Task Force determines may have a conflict of interest with regard to the matters being handled by the attorney.” There are currently 2 SOTF attorneys.
It is spell out in:
Sunshine Ordinance § 67.30. THE SUNSHINE ORDINANCE TASK FORCE
(a) There is hereby established a task force to be known as the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force consisting of eleven voting members appointed by the Board of Supervisors. All members must have experience and/or demonstrated interest in the issues of citizen access and participation in local government. Two members shall be appointed from individuals whose names have been submitted by the local chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists, one of whom shall be an attorney and one of whom shall be a local journalist. One member shall be appointed from the press or electronic media. One member shall be appointed from individuals whose names have been submitted by the local chapter of the League of Women Voters. Four members shall be members of the public who have demonstrated interest in or have experience in the issues of citizen access and participation in local government. Two members shall be members of the public experienced in consumer advocacy. One member shall be a journalist from a racial/ethnic-minority-owned news organization and shall be appointed from individuals whose names have been submitted by New California Media (defunct, now filled by Society of Professional Journalists). At all times the task force shall include at least one member who shall be a member of the public who is physically handicapped and who has demonstrated interest in citizen access and participation in local government. The Mayor or his or her designee, and the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors or his or her designee, shall serve as non- voting members of the task force. The City Attorney shall serve as legal advisor to the task force. The Sunshine Ordinance Task Force shall, at its request, have assigned to in an attorney from within the City Attorney's Office or other appropriate City Office, who is experienced in public-access law matters. This attorney shall serve solely as a legal advisor and advocate to the Task Force and an ethical wall will be maintained between the work of this attorney on behalf of the Task Force and any person or Office that the Task Force determines may have a conflict of interest with regard to the matters being handled by the attorney.
TOP SFSO § 67.31 RESPONSIBILITY FOR ADMINISTRATION
The Mayor shall administer and coordinate the implementation of the provisions of this chapter for departments under his or her control. The Mayor shall administer and coordinate the implementation of the provisions of this Chapter for departments under the control of board and commissions appointed by the Mayor. Elected officers shall administer and coordinate the implementation of the provisions of this chapter for departments under their respective control. The Clerk of the Board of Supervisors shall provide a full-time staff person to perform administrative duties for the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force and to assist any person in gaining access to public meetings or public information. The Clerk of the Board of Supervisors shall provide that staff person with whatever facilities and equipment are necessary to perform said duties.
Communicating with SOTF
There is really only two ways to get a response from SOTF , file a complaint or a Public Record Request. Action or discussion of requests or issues cannot take place outside of scheduled public hearings. Outside of hearings, SOTF members can only talk in generalities of California public access laws and not specifics of any complaint.If you file a complaint, all communications are put in the complaint file.
General communication that are directed at SOTF or cc:ed get logged and listed in the SOTF Administrators Report for possible review at regularly scheduled meetings. If requested and at the discretion of the SOTF Chair, communications can be forwarded to members of SOTF. A request to forward must be stated in the communications. Forwarding is not preferred since all decisions must be made in full view of the public.
TOP
Preparing a Complaint
Combined Complaints
The simpler your complaint is the better chance of success. If you have multiple issues with one local agency or department, there is a good chance they will be combined as one complaint by SOTF.The following criteria shall be used to determine if complaints should be combined for hearing purposes:
• Same nucleus of facts
• Same Complainant and Respondent
• Same Complaint and/or Administrative Codes Section in question
• Issues or violations must be within 90 days of submission of the initial complaint
• Same Complainant and Respondent
• Same Complaint and/or Administrative Codes Section in question
• Issues or violations must be within 90 days of submission of the initial complaint
SOTF will not combine complaints against separate local agencies or departments, even if the issue(s) of the complaints are the same. Each complaint only gets a 5 minutes opening statement and a 3 minute rebuttal with the possibility of questions.
Combined complaints or more complex complaints rely on members of SOTF to read your complaint and ask questions to get to the bottom of issues. The more evidence or communications you put in a complaint, the less likely it will be read by SOTF members. You can bury your most important points and records.
TOP
Common Complaints Violations
CPRA § 6253. (a) and SFSO § 67.21. (a) both deal with segregated content from records also known as redaction.CPRA § 6253 (c) and SFSO § 67.21. (b) Department, “local agency” or Custodian of Records has 10 days to respond to a public record request as to whether there are records that are responsive to the public record request and/ or records that are subject to withholding. They can ask for an extension of up to 14 days. “the agency shall state the estimated date and time when the records will be made available.”
CPRA § 6253.1 (a-d) and SFSO § 67.21 (c) the public agency or Custodian of Record must assist the requester to be successful. Identifiable records, other agency.
What records are disclosable or not violations covers large section of CA public record laws and depends on multiple factors.
SFSO § 67.22 (a) “a person or persons knowledgeable about the affairs of the department, to provide information,”
SFSO § 67.25 (a) “Immediate Disclosure Request” no later than the close of business on the day following the day of the request.
SFSO § 67.26 Withholding Kept to a Minimum
Any part of California public access laws can be used as a violation CA Constitution, Article I, Section 3, California Public Records Act, the Ralph M. Brown Act, and the Sunshine Ordinance. Links to them can be found here.
The other issue in preparing a complaint is jurisdiction issues. In most cases this is not a problem if it is city department or city local agency and the violation is one of the California public access laws. State departments and local agencies are not under the jurisdiction of SOTF. More on jurisdiction will be covered below. Also See Webage on Jurisdiction
Complaint Filing
You can File a Complaint Anonymously
People should seriously consider being anonymous, especially if your complaint is controversial or you plan on doing this for a period of time.To submit an anonymous complaint, you use the word “Anonymous” as your name. You must make sure that any records you submit are not traceable back to you and the information on the records do not have information that would reveal who you are. This includes contact information.
You cannot use an alias other than “Anonymous”.
TOP
Being Anonymous During a Hearing
Presenting a complaint at a hearing as an Anonymous can happen by calling in. Realize that using a telephone number that displays your name or can be traced back to you will compromise your anonymity. There are different levels of anonymity in using a phone or phone number.You should at least change your phones ID name. Your phone ID name does not have to be “Anonymous”. I can be any or none name. While to file a complaint with SOTF requires you to use your real name or Anonymous, it is not a requirement on phone identification.
All smart phones today come with the feature to Block Caller ID. It will change your cell phone to block caller ID, Anonymous Call, Anonymous Dialing or Unknown Number will always be displayed on the receiver call whenever you call them.
In settings on an Android Phone, go to Caller ID, tap, and select “Hide Number”.
Some carriers allow you to temporary hide your number on a call by call basis by using a prefix like #37, *67 or *37# though a carrier may have its own designated prefix. The prefix is dialed in followed by the telephone number.
Carriers can hide your caller ID permanently. There may be a charge. In this case, to unblock your number on a case-by-case basis, you will have to add a prefix like *82 or one your carrier provides before dialing the telephone number.
To block caller ID on an iPhone Settings, Phone, Show my caller ID and slide to Off.
Open source software https://www.asterisk.org/ or https://freeswitch.com/ and almost any VOIP company you can spoof calls with minimal costs and effort.
There are also other spoofing call commercial services.
TOP
Number of Complaints that can be Filed
There is no limit to the number of complaints that can be filed on different issues or against different local agencies. Only 2 complaints from a Petitioner/Complainant will be heard at any one hearing. At their discretion, the SOTF Chair or the SOTF Committees can exceed the maximum number of complaints per Petitioner/Complainant per hearing.SOTF’s Complaint Procedures can be found here
What is Required for a SOTF Complaint?
Short and concise description of the facts: (i.e. a description of documents requested, date of request, and any information regarding the agency’s response). The name of the Department where the request was submitted. Any individual working at the agency who the public records request or violation involves. Here you can also include contact information or the meeting details if it involves a meeting. If you do not provide specifics of people involved in the violation, SOTF lists the department head.A description of how the action or inaction violates the Sunshine Ordinance.
Supporting documentation, if applicable, such as a copy of the public record request to department and or any response from the department. Provide at least one reliable method of contacting the Petitioner/Complainant (i.e. email address, mailing address or telephone number). If your complaint does not include the above minimum as stated above, SOTF will try to contact you for the additional information.
TOP
Complaint Forms
You are not required to use SOTF’s complaint form.File the complaint in any form you want, but it must have the above requirements. The clearer you are, the better.
I have developed my own complaint forms in order to be clearer on the complaint components. I have experienced SOTF not reading their own complaint form as to what you think are the violations. I think the more you spell things out, the better. Not all violations are public record request violations and SOTF form and procedures are oriented for public record request violations, making it trickier if the violations or jurisdiction is outside the norm.
This a simple MS Word docx, so you can expand the input areas to what you need. For clarity, it covers more input area subjects than SOTF complaint forms. Click Here
The upside to using a pleading paper is that it is formatted for easy reading. It is numbered in different ways to allow for indexing and referring to other parts of the document. Along with the use of exhibit numbers, you can create your own number index environment in the complaint instead of SOTF “P numbers”.
SOTF’s Complaint Forms can be found here:
Online Complaint Form
pdf Complaint Form
TOP
SOTF “P numbers”
SOTF task force members use “P numbers” to identify records. They do not use pdf page numbers. So when you download an agenda item or your complaint from a SOTF agenda it will come as a pdf, but the “P numbers” are what matters to the task force. The “P numbers are on the bottom of the pages. They increment up for the entire year and not from the first page of a complaint.How and Where to File a SOTF Complaint
A complaint may be submitted to the SOTF via mail, fax, electronic mail (e-mail), or in person.E-mail: sotf@sfgov.org
E-mail is probably the best way and ask for a "received" reply. It is important to keep a paper/e-mail trail on all Public Record Request and SOTF Complaints.
Mail Address or In Person:
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
Room 244
San Francisco, CA 94102-4689
Business Hours: Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. (Except Legal Holidays)
Telephone: (415) 554-7724
Fax: (415) 554-5163
TOP
Procedures Before a SOTF Hearing
The SOTF Administrator may attempt to mediate the request. If the mediation does not work it, you may be advised to file a petition with the Supervisor of Records (an attorney with the City Attorney’s Office), supervisor.records@SFCITYATTY.ORG, which is covered at the end of the How to Make a Public Record Request webpage. The complaint must have the approval of the SOTF Chairperson, ensuring that the complaint is not a duplicative of previous complaints or subject. While SOTF maintains all records of previous hearings, they are not index to subject and outcomes, so it looks like the approval comes from memory. This part is problematic if you are denied. You can then take your complaint to your county Superior Court. (SFSO § 67.35 covered at the end of this webpage.)When your petition is accepted by SOTF, it will get a file number. The petitioner is supposed to be informed as soon as possible or within 2 days after SOTF next meeting but in no case greater than 45 days (SFSO § 67.21(e)) You should also get from the SOTF Administrator the SOTF complaint procedures.
SFSO § 67.21
(e) ......The Sunshine Task Force shall inform the petitioner, as soon as possible and within 2 days after its next meeting but in no case later than 45 days from when a petition in writing is received, of its determination whether the record requested, or any part of the record requested, is public. Where requested by the petition, and where otherwise desirable, this determination shall be in writing.
and mentioned in the complaint procedures "8 Continuances:(a) A complainant may waive the 45-day rule and request a continuance."
The problem with the 45 day rule is that it seems only to be about determining whether a record is public or not. It does not seem to apply to hearing a complaint or an appeal, especially if it is not a public record determination. Many other violations of the Sunshine Ordinance or Brown Act are not determination of records being public. I have had an appeal open for about 2 years. The whole 45 day "inform the petitioner" is fuzzy. There is no clear spelled out timeline except for the above 45 days. All but public record determinations seem to be open-ended.
The complainant may ask for a continuance and waive the 45-day rule. If the request is receive before five business days before the scheduled hearing, it will be granted. Less than five business days before a hearing or for subsequent continuances, the request requires a simple majority vote of member present.
If the respondent has not been informed of your complaint yet, SOTF sends a written notice of the complaint and requests that the respondent respond to the charges with 5 business days.
The SOTF Deputy City Attorney(s) reviews the complaint and prepares a legal memorandum to assist the SOTF members in understanding the laws and court cases around the issues of the complaint.
SFSO § 67.21. PROCESS FOR GAINING ACCESS TO PUBLIC RECORDS; ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS. (Below under SOTF Authority)
TOP
Before the SOTF Hearings.
In a normal procedure there are two hearings, a committee hearing and a hearing before the full SOTF.Agendas/Submission of New Information
Before each hearing, the SOTF administrator sends out agendas (pdf) for hearings on the committee level and full SOTF 12 days before the hearing. Your hearing and file number will be listed. A message at the bottom of the agenda states:Documentation (evidence supporting/disputing complaint)
For a document to be considered, it must be received at least five (5) working days before the hearing (see attached Public Complaint Procedure). For inclusion in the agenda packet, supplemental/supporting documents must be received by 5:00 pm, month date, year.
You and the respondent can submit more supporting documents or evidence before each hearing.
After this time period, you will not be able to submit anymore documents for SOTF consideration, except if you are at your first preliminary committee level hearing, you will be able to submit documents before the full SOTF hearing in the time frame as stated above.
TOP
Petitioner/Complainant Representation
The Petitioner/Complainant can have a knowledgeable person represent them at SOTF hearings. The Petitioner/Complainant must give SOTF a signed letter allowing the representative with the person’s name, a statement that the representative is authorized to represent the Petitioner/Complainant and the complaint file number. SOTF reserves the right to verify information.Petitioner/Complainant Presence at Hearings
The Petitioner/Complainant can make an initial appearance in person or phone at the first hearing and then authorize SOTF to proceed with future hearings on the complaint without them. The Petitioner/Complainant waives their right to provide testimony, and only prior submitted written documents will be considered. If a Petitioner/Complainant fails to appear before a SOTF hearing and does not communicate, their complaint may be dismissed. SOTF bends over backwards to facilitate the complaint process. The Petitioner/Complainant will be notified of the dismissal. The Petitioner/Complainant has 60 days to request in writing a reopening of the complaint.If the Petitioner/Complainant is unable or refuses to attend a scheduled hearing on a specific date within 120 days, SOTF may schedule a hearing to consider taking no further action and close the complaint file.
The Petitioner/Complainant can also refile the complaint in the future, but SOTF and/or the SOTF chairperson can decide not to hear the complaint. The Petitioner/Complainant next option would be to go to the county superior court. (SFSO § 67.35 covered at the end of this webpage.)
TOP
Dress Code for a SOTF Hearing
There is no dress code. It is best to dress as yourself and what you comfortable in.Conduct at SOTF Hearing (SOTF Bylaws and Complaint Procedures)
SOTF members are addressed as Mr. or Ms. and last name. Chairperson as Chairman or Chairwoman and last name.Petitioner/Complainant or Respondent can be called Petitioner/Complainant or Respondent or Mr. or Ms. and last name.
Meetings of the Task Force shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including but not limited to the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code Section 54950 et. seq.), the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance (San Francisco Administrative Code, Chapter 67) and the Task Force’s By-Laws. Except where state or local laws or other rules provide to the contrary, meetings shall be governed by Robert’s Rules of Order.
Sound producing electronic devices shall be silenced during meetings of the Task Force. The Chair may issue a warning to any member of the public whose electronic device disrupts the Task Force meeting. In the event of repeated disruptions caused by pagers, cell phones or any sound producing device, the Chair shall direct the offending member of the public to leave the meeting.
People who attend a hearing of the SOTF are expected to behave responsibly and respectfully. Any member of SOTF may call for decorum due to disorderly conduct. Any person engaging in threatening or menacing behavior may be asked to leave.
TOP
Scheduling of Complaints at Hearings
The SOTF Chairperson determines scheduling of complaints through which committee and dates. This schedule for a complaint hearing is usually as soon as possible. If the date does not work for the Petitioner/Complainant or the respondent, SOTF has shown flexibility to reschedule.Before all hearings, SOTF members hearing your complaint are supposed to be familiar with the complaint issues (read the complaint) and the SOTF Deputy City Attorney memorandum on the complaint. SOTF members are volunteers, so I find how prepared they actually varies.
Initial 3 person SOTF Committee Hearing
The first hearing of your complaint will most likely be a 3-member SOTF committee. Both the Petitioner/Complainant and respondent(s) (or a knowledgeable representative) must attend the committee hearing. The committee will determine jurisdiction and merits of the complaint. The committee will give the full SOTF a report and or recommendation.***It is really important for the petitioner to understand that the initial committee hearing is a determination of jurisdiction and merits of their complaint. Jurisdiction is usually straightforward if it is a city department or official. It is based on definitions found in The Brown Act (most powerful definitions), CPRA and the Sunshine Ordinance. More on jurisdiction will be covered below. Also See Webage on Jurisdiction
Merits of your complaint go to a violation of any of the public access laws. The committees often state whether records are public or not, but they should be stating whether there is a possible violation of public access laws as not all complaints are about public records. Stating that the records are public is an inference that there is a possible violation.
For the petitioner this is also a good time to listen to what the other side, the respondent says and this will prepare you for rebutting their arguments at the full SOTF.
TOP
Agenda for SOTF Committees or Full SOTF Accessing all Records that have been Submitted for a Complaint including the Respondent
4-5 days before the hearing, the SOTF clerk sends out another agenda (pdf). This agenda looks similar to the previous one but if you click on your file name or anywhere in the description of your complaint, it will take you to a link to a pdf of the complaint and all documents that have been submitted for that file for your hearing. The file pdf will include any rebuttal statement or document from the recipient of the complaint, your (the petitioner) statement and documents, and the SOTF attorney’s analysis of the complaint.You can do this for any other file number of other people’s hearings and past similar agendas in the SOTF archive.
TOP
Participating in Hearings in Person or via Phone
***During the COVID 19, all hearings are conducted over the phone. You are calling into SOTF Microsoft Team Meetings which has issues of its own. SOTF members can see each other. The public cannot.Members of the public may participate by phone or may submit their comments by email to: Cheryl.Leger@sfgov.org; all comments received will be made a part of the official record. Sunshine Ordinance Task Force agendas and their associated documents are available at https://sfbos.org/sunshine. The Sunshine Ordinance Task Force (SOTF) allows the public to speak or read for 3 minutes during their public comment section. They allow up to a 150 words to be submitted for their minutes whether you read the same words over 150 in the 3-minute public comment. You can submit both the full comment and the reduced 150 word brief written summary.
PETITIONER and PUBLIC COMMENT CALL IN
1-415-906-4659
Meeting ID: # (get off the agenda)
***When you first call in, you are unmuted.*** To mute yourself - *6 (star 6). You should hear “You are now muted” message. To unmute yourself - *6 (star 6) again. Beware, there is a delay of time when you mute or unmute yourself.
The in person hearings when scheduled are at:
Hearing Room 408
City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
San Francisco, CA 94102-4689
Even when in person hearings are scheduled you can still participate by phone.

Hearings
Meetings shall be governed by Robert's Rules of Order. (SOTF Bylaws)No one is under oath. There is no cross-examination of statement and witnesses. Any questioning relies on the curiosity of SOTF members.
On addressing SOTF as a whole, it is better to call them “the task force” than try to stumble through the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force or SOTF.
TOP

Complaint Comment and Deliberation Procedures for SOTF Committees and full SOTF hearings (The following is based on the SOTF Bylaws)
When your complaint is called, the Petitioner/Complainant gets a 5 minute opening statement. Anyone speaking on behalf of Petitioner/Complainant speaks next and gets 3 minutes.Then the Respondent gets a 5 minute opening statement and anyone speaking on behalf of the Respondents gets 3 minutes.
The people speaking on behalf of either side this is the only time they will get to speak on the complaint unless a SOTF member asks them a question. They cannot speak later at the Public Comment time on the complaint.
SOTF members then discuss the complaint or ask questions to either side.
Next, the Respondent then the Petitioner/Complainant each get 3 more minutes to rebut, add information and make a closing argument.
The complaint goes back to the task force members for deliberation and a motion(s).
Public Comment is then allowed by anyone who has not spoken on the complaint. (Each agenda item also the public to make one 3-minute comment on the issues of the agenda item.)
The task force members then vote on a motion to either find a violation, find no violation, or to take no further action and close the file.
Tactics
The opening Petitioner/Complainant 5 minutes statement and going first is a shot in the dark because you have no idea where the hearing and deliberations are going to go. I have found that Respondent and people speaking on behalf of the Respondent can go on all sorts of tangents and derail the hearing in other directions. If the Petitioner/Complainant is not asked questions, then the Petitioner/Complainant only has 3 minutes to address it all at the end.People speaking in support of the Petitioner/Complainant in the 3 minutes after the Petitioner/Complainant opening statement is almost always a waste of time, as these people could speak during the Public Comment time and try to clean up any messes before the final vote.
TOP
Vote to Pass a Motion
SOTF Bylaws Section 7. Action at a Meeting; Quorum and Required Vote.SOTF Bylaws Section 7 has a line that states “The affirmative vote of a majority of the members of the Task Force (six) shall be required for the approval of all substantive matters. Procedural matters shall require an affirmative vote of a majority of the members present.”
Substantive matters are jurisdiction and complaint determinations of SOTF. The six votes is the affirmative are needed no matter the number of SOTF members present. If less than eleven members (the full SOTF) are present, then this reduces the chance of getting six votes in the affirmative. When all eleven members of SOTF are present, you will get a majority of votes either way.
Order of Determination
If a motion of the SOTF finds in violation or no violation and Order of Determination is issued by the SOTF Chair.An Order of Determination will have the date of the determination and date of the decision (vote of SOTF), Case Title, Facts of the Case, Hearing on the Complaint, Finding of Facts and Conclusion of Law, Decision and Order of Determination and how then SOTF members voted.
The Order of Determination is an opinion of SOTF as an advisory task force. Because the way the hearings are conducted and no one is under oath and there is no cross-examination of statements, the “Finding of Facts and Conclusion of Law” can be limited and not based on actual or all the facts.
TOP
If the SOTF Motion Passes in Favor of the Complainant, (Violation Found)
SOTF orders the Custodian of Records to turn over the records within five business days or if it is a non-record violation to correct the violation in five business days(?).The Compliance and Amendments Committee shall review whether there has been compliance with the Order of Determination.
This part of the Sunshine Ordinance (SFSO § 67.21. (e)) and SOTF procedures is broken:
2. If there is a failure to comply, a Committee of the SOTF may recommend that the SOTF notify the District Attorney, the California Attorney General, the Board of Supervisors and/or the Ethics Commission, who may take measures they deem necessary to ensure compliance with the Ordinance. A copy of the Order of Determination shall be included with such notification.
3. If appropriate, the respondent and complainant shall be sent a notice that the District Attorney, California Attorney General, Board of Supervisors and Ethics Commission have been contacted, and of the complainant’s independent right to pursue the issue in court.
3. If appropriate, the respondent and complainant shall be sent a notice that the District Attorney, California Attorney General, Board of Supervisors and Ethics Commission have been contacted, and of the complainant’s independent right to pursue the issue in court.
If the SOTF Motion is Unfavorable to the Complainant, (Violation Not Found or No Motion)
Reconsideration of Task Force Findings (Appeal)
With 30 days of publication/issuance of the Order of Determination, either the petitioner/complainant or respondent may petition the SOTF for reconsideration only if information exists that was not available at the time of the hearing. The petitioning party must present the new information and provide a written explanation as to how the new information may change the SOTF’s determination. The SOTF will accept no more than one request for reconsideration from each party for any specific complaint.SOTF or its committees shall consider petition for reconsideration at its next available meeting and determine if new information exist, is relevant and may change the outcome of the complaint. If a petition for reconsideration is granted, the hearing on the complaint will be reopened and rescheduled for hearing before the SOTF on a future date to consider the new information.
TOP
Reconsideration Hearing Procedure:
a. If a request for reconsideration is granted the complaint will be scheduled for hearing at the next available SOTF meeting.
b. The SOTF’s previous vote to find violation shall be considered rescinded with a vote pending action.
c. The requester of the reconsideration shall be provided five (5) minutes to provide testimony as to how the new information provided will affect the decision of the SOTF.
d. The opposing parties will be provided five (5) minutes to provide testimony regarding the new information provided.
NOTE: Testimony should be limited to the submitted new information.
e. The SOTF may perform one of the follow actions based upon the new information submitted by the petitioner:
i. Move to revote on the original motion without changes
ii. Move to substitute a motion with a different action
f. Accept public comment on the motionb. The SOTF’s previous vote to find violation shall be considered rescinded with a vote pending action.
c. The requester of the reconsideration shall be provided five (5) minutes to provide testimony as to how the new information provided will affect the decision of the SOTF.
d. The opposing parties will be provided five (5) minutes to provide testimony regarding the new information provided.
NOTE: Testimony should be limited to the submitted new information.
e. The SOTF may perform one of the follow actions based upon the new information submitted by the petitioner:
i. Move to revote on the original motion without changes
ii. Move to substitute a motion with a different action
g. SOTF votes on the motion
h. If the actions of the SOTF changes, a Revised Order of Determination will be issued. An additional Orders of Determination will not be issued by the SOTF if their decision is unchanged.
h. If the actions of the SOTF changes, a Revised Order of Determination will be issued. An additional Orders of Determination will not be issued by the SOTF if their decision is unchanged.
Taking Your Complaint to Your County Superior Court
There will be a whole webpage devoted to this.In short, you have 90 days to file for injunctive relief, declaratory relief, or writ of mandate with your county Superior Civil Court. (SFOS § 67.35) Who you file it against depends on the violation and who is making the decision. It can be the “local agency”, city department or against SOTF. Even if SOTF is not the defendant, the Order of Determination will probably be submitted as an authoritative advisory opinion.
With the courts, all things submitted have to be true to the best of a person's knowledge. If there is a hearing, people are under oath.
SFSO § 67.35 ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS
(a) Any person may institute proceedings for injunctive relief, declaratory relief, or writ of mandate in any court of competent jurisdiction to enforce his or her right to inspect or to receive a copy of any public record or class of public records under this Ordinance or to enforce his or her right to attend any meeting required under this Ordinance to be open, or to compel such meeting to be open.
(b) A court shall award costs and reasonable attorneys' fees to the plaintiff who is the prevailing party in an action brought to enforce this Ordinance.
(c) If a court finds that an action filed pursuant to this section is frivolous, the City and County may assert its rights to be paid its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs.
(d) Any person may institute proceedings for enforcement and penalties under this act in any court of competent jurisdiction or before the Ethics Commission if enforcement action is not taken by a City or State official 40 days after a complaint is filed.
(b) A court shall award costs and reasonable attorneys' fees to the plaintiff who is the prevailing party in an action brought to enforce this Ordinance.
(c) If a court finds that an action filed pursuant to this section is frivolous, the City and County may assert its rights to be paid its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs.
(d) Any person may institute proceedings for enforcement and penalties under this act in any court of competent jurisdiction or before the Ethics Commission if enforcement action is not taken by a City or State official 40 days after a complaint is filed.
TOP
Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction issues are not violation issues but can stop a complaint from proceeding through the SOTF process. One of the first determinations SOTF does is determine whether they have jurisdiction over a “local agency” or violation. Jurisdiction revolves around definitions in the CPRA, SFSO and the Brown Act. The Sunshine Ordinance incorporates all of CPRA and the Brown Act. The CPRA incorporates some of the Brown Act definitions. Of the three CA public access laws, the Brown Act has the most expansive and strongest definitions of what government entities are covered under CA public access laws. Also See Webage on JurisdictionIf you feel that the agency you are alleging a violation against may come under the question of jurisdiction, it is good to go into the SOTF committee with the definition that supports the agency inclusion as to under SOTF jurisdiction. Court case law can also help.
Knowledgeable Respondent
Respondent should be a knowledgeable person on the issue of the complaint.Sunshine Ordinance Sec 67.22 Release of oral public information shall be accomplished as follows:
(a) Every department head shall designate a person or persons knowledgeable about the affairs of the department, to provide information, including oral information, to the public about the de-partment's operations, plans, policies and positions.....
Knowledgeable is a key word.
In my opinion, if SOTF determines that the designated representative is not fully knowledgeable or none appears at a hearing then you should not vote or issue an Order of Determination for the city. Each hearing, SOTF is also asking for the public record.
SOTF hearings and documents become public record. Transparency of government relies on records and oral information to be accurate and true. While there is no swearing to an oath, SFSO § 67.22 “Release of oral public information” is an oath of the respondent to a commitment to tell the truth, if not than the purpose of Sunshine laws becomes meaningless. This oath idea has not been tested.
SOTF cannot force knowledgeable city employees to appear before you, but if they do not you can vote that the city has violated 67.22(a). The Sunshine Ordinance Task Force does now ask if the City’s Respondent before them is knowledgeable about the complaint and if not finds that City’s Department in violation of 67.22(a).
TOP
Sunshine Ordinance Task Force Authority Under the Sunshine Ordinance (SFSO § 67.21(e), 67.30 (c)) and San Francisco Administrative Code 12L.5
SFSO § 67.21. (e) If the custodian refuses, fails to comply, or incompletely complies with a request described in (b) above or if a petition is denied or not acted on by the supervisor of public records, the person making the request may petition the Sunshine Task Force for a determination whether the record requested is public. The Sunshine Task Force shall inform the petitioner, as soon as possible and within 2 days after its next meeting but in no case later than 45 days from when a petition in writing is received, of its determination whether the record requested, or any part of the record requested, is public. Where requested by the petition, and where otherwise desirable, this determination shall be in writing. Upon the determination that the record is public, the Sunshine Task Force shall immediately order the custodian of the public record to comply with the person's request. If the custodian refuses or fails to comply with any such order within 5 days, the Sunshine Task Force shall notify the district attorney or the attorney general who may take whatever measures she or he deems necessary to insure compliance with the provisions of this ordinance. The Board of Supervisors and the City Attorney's office shall provide sufficient staff and resources to allow the Sunshine Task Force to fulfill its duties under this provision. Where requested by the petition, the Sunshine Task Force may conduct a public hearing concerning the records request denial. An authorized representative of the custodian of the public records requested shall attend any hearing and explain the basis for its decision to withhold the records requested.
TOP
SFSO § 67.30
(c) The task force shall advise the Board of Supervisors and provide information to other City departments on appropriate ways in which to implement this chapter. The task force shall develop appropriate goals to ensure practical and timely implementation of this chapter. The task force shall propose to the Board of Supervisors amendments to this chapter. The task force shall report to the Board of Supervisors at least once annually on any practical or policy problems encountered in the administration of this chapter. The Task Force shall receive and review the annual report of the Supervisor of Public Records and may request additional reports or information as it deems necessary. The Task Force shall make referrals to a municipal office with enforcement power under this ordinance or under the California Public Records Act and the Brown Act whenever it concludes that any person has violated any provisions of this ordinance or the Acts. The Task Force shall, from time to time as it sees fit, issue public reports evaluating compliance with this ordinance and related California laws by the City or any Department, Office, or Official thereof.
San Francisco Administrative Code. 12L.5. PUBLIC ACCESS TO RECORDS.
(b) Dispute Resolution. A member of the public who requests additional financial information other than that described in Section 12L.5(a), above, or who has a complaint concerning a nonprofit organization’s compliance or noncompliance with this Chapter, may submit that request or complaint to the City agency or department which is a party to and/or which administers the nonprofit organization’s contract. That City agency or department shall consider the request or complaint and shall recommend a resolution thereof in accordance with procedures established by that City agency or department. Following such consideration and recommendation, the member of the public or the nonprofit organization may seek an advisory opinion concerning the request or complaint from the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force, which that Task Force shall be authorized to provide; provided, however, that failure to seek such an advisory opinion from the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force shall not prejudice the right of the member of the public and/or the nonprofit organization to obtain a review of the City agency or department’s recommendation by the Board of Supervisors as provided herein. The member of the public or the nonprofit organization may request that the Board of Supervisors review the recommendation of the City agency or department, which review shall be conducted in accordance with procedures established by the Board of Supervisors, provided that such request is made in writing to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors within ten days of the issuance of the City agency or department’s recommendation or the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force’s advisory opinion, whichever is later. Subject to Section 12L.7. herein, the recommendation of the City agency or department, or the determination of the Board of Supervisors, with respect to any request or complaint by a member of the public shall be nonbinding upon the nonprofit organization.
TOP

ARTICLE VI. COMMITTEES. (SOTF By Laws)
Section 1. Standing Committees. The Task Force may form standing committees to advise the Task Force on its on-going functions, hold hearings, make recommendations, and perform delegated tasks. The standing committees shall be composed of less than a quorum of members of the Task Force. The Chair of the Task Force shall appoint or remove the Chair and members of the Standing Committees. The Task Force shall establish the following Standing Committees: Rules Committee; Education, Outreach and Training Committee; Complaints Committee; and Compliance & Amendments Committee.
(a) Rules Committee. The Rules Committee shall review matters related to amendments to the Task Force by-laws and procedures for Task Force meetings and shall assist the Chair of the Task Force to ensure that all annual objectives enumerated in the Sunshine Ordinance are met by the Task Force. In addition, the Rules Committee shall schedule hearings on complaints to review jurisdiction and the merits of the complaint in order to provide recommendations to the Full Task Force.
(b) Education, Outreach, and Training Committee. The Education, Outreach and Training Committee may monitor compliance with the Orders of Determination adopted by the Task Force, maintain an ongoing education and training program for City employees and the public, and make recommendations to the Task Force regarding outreach and publicity to the media. In addition, the Education, Outreach and Training Committee shall schedule hearings on complaints to review jurisdiction and the merits of the complaint in order to provide recommendations to the Full Task Force.
(c) Complaint Committee. The Complaint Committee shall monitor the complaint process and make recommendations to the Task Force regarding how the complaints should be handled. The Complaint Committee shall schedule hearings on complaints to review jurisdiction and the merits of the complaint in order to provide recommendations to the Full Task Force.
(d) Compliance & Amendments Committee. The Compliance and Amendments Committee may monitor compliance with the Orders of Determination adopted by the Task Force, monitor changes in state law and court decisions affecting access to public meetings and records, and make recommendations to the Task Force regarding amendments to the Sunshine Ordinance. In addition, the Compliance and Amendments Committee shall schedule hearings on complaints to review jurisdiction and the merits of the complaint in order to provide recommendations to the Full Task Force.
Section 2. Special or Ad Hoc Committees. Upon approval by a majority of the members of the Task Force, the Task Force may form special or ad hoc committees. Special committees shall be formed for a specific purpose and cease to exist after completion of a designated task. Special committees may be composed of members of the Task Force and may include members of the public, city officials or city employees as well.(b) Education, Outreach, and Training Committee. The Education, Outreach and Training Committee may monitor compliance with the Orders of Determination adopted by the Task Force, maintain an ongoing education and training program for City employees and the public, and make recommendations to the Task Force regarding outreach and publicity to the media. In addition, the Education, Outreach and Training Committee shall schedule hearings on complaints to review jurisdiction and the merits of the complaint in order to provide recommendations to the Full Task Force.
(c) Complaint Committee. The Complaint Committee shall monitor the complaint process and make recommendations to the Task Force regarding how the complaints should be handled. The Complaint Committee shall schedule hearings on complaints to review jurisdiction and the merits of the complaint in order to provide recommendations to the Full Task Force.
(d) Compliance & Amendments Committee. The Compliance and Amendments Committee may monitor compliance with the Orders of Determination adopted by the Task Force, monitor changes in state law and court decisions affecting access to public meetings and records, and make recommendations to the Task Force regarding amendments to the Sunshine Ordinance. In addition, the Compliance and Amendments Committee shall schedule hearings on complaints to review jurisdiction and the merits of the complaint in order to provide recommendations to the Full Task Force.
TOP
Sunshine Ordinance Task Force Audio/Transcripts
How to use YouTube Transcript
To get a transcript to go with audio/video, click more in the description under video:
Then click Show Transcript at the bottom of the description:

On the right side of the video, you will get a transcript box. Clicking on the 3 dots at the top right of the transcript box turns on and off the time stamp view.

**** The best thing about this YouTube transcript is you click on any time stamp entry or entry in the transcript and it takes you to that point in the audio.
To search the transcripts:
Windows: Ctrl + F, Mac: Cmd +F, Once the search bar is open, input the word or term you are looking for and press Enter. Examples: Agenda Item # or Complaint # or any words from the agenda or you remember hearing. If the word(s) is in the transcript, each instance will be highlighted. Press the arrow keys in the search bar to move between the highlighted cases.The transcript is rough for names. For example, in the picture below, Cher Yan should be Chair Yankee, but with normal conversation, the word translation is good even down to the “uh”.
You can copy any section or all of the transcript, including time stamps for use off of YouTube:
In Windows, hold down the Ctrl + Shift keys, in Mac, hold down keys Cmd + Shift, scroll section, or all of what you want to highlight, and then hit the V key to copy.
Paste in a document program.
With time stamps in the copy, you can do word searches in the document program for what word(s) you are looking for, note the time stamp and quickly find the audio point by clicking on the YouTube webpage transcript next to the video/audio.
TOP
SOTF and SOTF Committee Hearing YouTube Links
Index to Committee and Year:Full SOTF: 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
Complaint Committee: 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
Compliance & Amendment Committee: 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
Education, Outreach & Training Committee: 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009
Rules Committee: 2022 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2011 | 2009
Information Technology Committee: 2022 | 2019 | 2017 | 2012
sfneighborhoods.net YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@sfneighborhoods
Full SOTF Hearings
20252025-1-21 Special https://youtu.be/TLF-j1yIuvQ
2025-1-1 Canceled
2024
2024-12-4 https://youtu.be/WsmxlMKfdU0
2024-11-19 https://youtu.be/NsyyfhrJVww
2024-11-6 Canceled because of insufficient notice
2024-10-2 https://youtu.be/44_ECb4xoQ0
2024-9-4 https://youtu.be/Baq2kn9oHvw
2024-8-7 https://youtu.be/q5SETtD57vs
2024-7-3 Canceled Lack of Quorum
2024-6-5 https://youtu.be/iVSAv9toIzA
2024-5-1 https://youtu.be/7wVlR15OoyY
2024-4-4 https://youtu.be/B736LzgQrzM
2024-3-6 https://youtu.be/kkMk5kJ0-qo
2024-2-7 https://youtu.be/_PKw_zY2IgE
2024-1-31 Special https://youtu.be/I3J9mvALxLI
2024-1-3 https://youtu.be/gvyG9g1eLYE
2023
2023-11-1 https://youtu.be/-xKdtEDaAVI
2023-10-4 https://youtu.be/qRdYZKQ3i3o
2023-9-6 https://youtu.be/mg-PvrI--BY
2023-8-22 Special https://youtu.be/gzG3AfRHpLU
2023-7-25 Special https://youtu.be/XhhIvRliU4c
2023-6-7 https://youtu.be/SB1btvehrK0
2023-5-3 https://youtu.be/I67DePgKqys
2023-4-5 https://youtu.be/_mKHG3vlWSg
2023-3-1 https://youtu.be/jN8XtplpzGQ
2023-2-1 https://youtu.be/_wKX3LutQHQ
2022
2022-12-7 https://youtu.be/mTgwnnzGNzY
2022-11-2 https://youtu.be/p7v7EjUf4Ik
2022-10-5 https://youtu.be/XqGZozAqgEE
2022-9-7 https://youtu.be/zFA3oh9o3CY
2022-8-3 https://youtu.be/1KavJcCPveY
2022-7-6 https://youtu.be/xpoTS_i6Rsc
2022-6-1 https://youtu.be/CLf05-lpho8
2022-5-4 https://youtu.be/pIh_MhU_Eik
2022-4-6 https://youtu.be/Wc0t8wyV5Ts
2022-3-2 https://youtu.be/khOaAhaOzkQ
2022-2-2 https://youtu.be/JBSLa2n6wv4
2022-1-25 Special https://youtu.be/npi3N3VqV6Q
2022-1-5 https://youtu.be/N_cBTsSnfLY
2021
2021-12-1 https://youtu.be/EPFi6PA8VK4
2021-11-3 https://youtu.be/stZpq-nlA7E
2021-10-6 https://youtu.be/_BwvRXRkdQ8
2021-9-1 https://youtu.be/Wl-Ikv8G4TA
2021-8-4 https://youtu.be/yQuo9qpVHXo
2021-7-7 https://youtu.be/C3pKTcSxNKE
2021-6-2 https://youtu.be/VTzXkQVK_sI
2021-5-5 https://youtu.be/R8yDfwxYfDk
2021-4-7 https://youtu.be/YQzychns4F8
2021-3-3 https://youtu.be/8WEAt6huA58
2021-2-3 https://youtu.be/Erm3kJsdSg8
2021-1-12 Special https://youtu.be/lD_NeiWfIn0
2021-1-6 https://youtu.be/j8_aHHteEc8
SOFT Hearings Index
TOP
2020
2020-12-2 https://youtu.be/Ptbl3sARCjs
2020-11-10 https://youtu.be/kWr2yM8U1WM
2020-11-4 https://youtu.be/E4JhXjwXrAY
2020-10-7 https://youtu.be/CPh_qrVX8is
2020-9-2 https://youtu.be/yLh1rCqGlSU
2020-8-12 https://youtu.be/GTZGTCeuftg
2020-7-1 https://youtu.be/4300XUiELSw
2020-6-23 Special https://youtu.be/tpFtwWFPuVQ
2020-6-10 https://youtu.be/pIWqZaL4sW0
2020-5 closed pandemic
2020-4 closed pandemic
2020-3-4 https://youtu.be/Tf-C2LRFrc0
2020-2-5 https://youtu.be/dMDTp1YcfS8
2020-1-21 https://youtu.be/To8DLFrcvnw
2020-1-14 https://youtu.be/jKTpEbFxaOU
2019
2019-12-4 https://youtu.be/QU_T9fUKEug
2019-11-6 https://youtu.be/QHWlvjjaqag
2019-10-2 https://youtu.be/WsFynrc0018
2019-9-4 https://youtu.be/BZzlCgs8U5A
2019-8-7 https://youtu.be/GPSERqtqO5k
2019-7-16 https://youtu.be/CwQrxRzpvkY
2019-6-5 https://youtu.be/Ba36d933M6A
2019-5-1 https://youtu.be/g-ePJOfoOMo
2019-4-3 https://youtu.be/AOaJbcoQcvE
2019-3-6 https://youtu.be/-bS5jUYxpBM
2019-2-6 https://youtu.be/Oa8U5eylqPc
2019-1-15 Special https://youtu.be/tjympAPbSfY
2019-1-2 https://youtu.be/VHM6Bf7OaQI
2018
2018-12-5 https://youtu.be/4LHzmBPWtUg
2018-11-7 https://youtu.be/uepTJq4ghTs
2018-10-3 https://youtu.be/4ALL-lZzeis
2018-8-1 https://youtu.be/Of76jMDVTH4
2018-6-6 https://youtu.be/1PRBSSONY2k
2018-4-4 https://youtu.be/Tggfv7YJdxQ
2018-3-7 https://youtu.be/oZjWVPMkM2U
2018-2-7 https://youtu.be/Mfdq2OLBpfo
2018-1-16 https://youtu.be/S9OTYZfPIgA
SOFT Hearings Index
TOP
2017
2017-12-19 Special https://youtu.be/boH4n8-t5zY
2017-12-6 https://youtu.be/vc_EAi8TYdU
2017-11-1 https://youtu.be/ZR_75pf1xTc
2017-10-4 https://youtu.be/7FRIqp36jPY
2017-9-6 https://youtu.be/slo0lirMxFQ
2017-8-2 https://youtu.be/PbU5f7_m0bk
2017-7-5 https://youtu.be/7QngCwFOv9E
2017-6-7 https://youtu.be/r5617vk2Epk
2017-5-3 https://youtu.be/3X03n4DUFsE
2017-4-5 https://youtu.be/qSt5ddaXdZg
2017-3-2 https://youtu.be/A8AZVGCCBUc
2017-2-7 https://youtu.be/eaOU-D_GJLg
2017-1-4 https://youtu.be/C7SB5sNLtLY
2016
2016-12-7 https://youtu.be/7uEDHWkQApY
2016-11-2 https://youtu.be/EWvkdIMu7i4
2016-10-5 https://youtu.be/PKoTjukLS3I
2016-9-7 https://youtu.be/QAENSI3Ecgg
2016-8-3 https://youtu.be/4tIed5_wL0Q
2016-7-6 https://youtu.be/VRPOfWBHLa8
2016-6-1 https://youtu.be/HaEQZlC_hKw
2016-5-4 https://youtu.be/iHkWKVQVTro
2016-4-6 https://youtu.be/yPCJPrvjocg
2016-3-2 https://youtu.be/JIbBLIPdgbE
2016-2-3 https://youtu.be/4ZscoA9HYBI
2016-1-6 https://youtu.be/gmH74xqUEQM
2015
2015-12-2 https://youtu.be/2sL_SNMAM9M
2015-11-4 https://youtu.be/yw5Ozq8Z1Cg
2015-10-7 https://youtu.be/HPXY8vK2P_U
2015-9-2 https://youtu.be/p8FQFFkC99Q
2015-8-5 https://youtu.be/hCIn7yrX7QQ
2015-7-1 https://youtu.be/Jt2Pp8-4mnk
2015-6-3 https://youtu.be/GqGFzVK8UPs
2015-5-6 https://youtu.be/1dgrJ4uW3KU
2015-4-1 https://youtu.be/v7oGVjg-8IM
2015-3-4 https://youtu.be/pe8LM8XVKXk
2015-2-4 https://youtu.be/qZzc-RFuDYo
2015-1-7 https://youtu.be/gVdcJTr0-EY
SOFT Hearings Index
TOP
2014
2014-12-3 https://youtu.be/3r4ECIOp3AQ
2014-11-5 https://youtu.be/CBoLtwRawn4
2014-10-28 Special https://youtu.be/0VXfCAr7rNk
2014-10-1 https://youtu.be/7nrzzBkJGHk
2014-9-23 Special https://youtu.be/PCbvzvh47tQ
2014-9-3 https://youtu.be/0aZ3dhGPoL4
2014-8-26 Special https://youtu.be/__Z72i300AI
2014-8-6 https://youtu.be/ZvOk0ib4Ysg
2014-7-22 Special https://youtu.be/UF8ILcxNioY
2014-7-2 https://youtu.be/8ZzmN1wqPNE
2014-6-24 Special https://youtu.be/WbbikQekLd0
2014-6-4 https://youtu.be/xzghq0-fuyo
2014-5-19 https://youtu.be/p5fuzWhUVeQ
2014-4-30 Special https://youtu.be/OGx81N0CtmU
2014-4-2 https://youtu.be/5SLQk7PpDuc
2014-3-5 https://youtu.be/X3QYA3iMC2Q
2014-2-5 https://youtu.be/UrL0nAG_gNY
2014-1-30 https://youtu.be/oOg2Lcl7CqM
2013
2013-12-4 https://youtu.be/QYnrHZDb3q8
2013-11-6 https://youtu.be/E1qGXhhWYHE
2013-10-2 https://youtu.be/NMjeswppRKA
2013-9-4 https://youtu.be/Jull9y2Vvro
2013-8-7 https://youtu.be/IZ6rECsgFgQ
2013-7-9 Partial Recording 4 hours technical difficulties https://youtu.be/Qh7UcOihGmE
2013-6-5 https://youtu.be/OdW0yg9ecNI
2013-5-1 https://youtu.be/ky-BR_iy5CE
2013-4-3 https://youtu.be/fKEH9z3H-xY
2013-3-6 https://youtu.be/_QGspLs5Ig8
2013-2-6 https://youtu.be/Rala1Xl1hx0
2013-1-16 https://youtu.be/IDgFVxcw4PQ
2012
2012-12-12 Special https://youtu.be/7QfnRJdae0Q
2012-12-3 https://youtu.be/4BUVIETLv1k
2012-11-7 https://youtu.be/bTl7MCvRfgI
2012-7-11 https://youtu.be/M2zavVc0yos
2012-6-6 https://youtu.be/r1PxDyncEDk
2012-5-2 https://youtu.be/_y7a2XpV7QY
2012-4-4 https://youtu.be/kPplokWL7Es
2012-3-7 https://youtu.be/4KntFGYi8ig
2012-2-28 https://youtu.be/blzedaj6Dhw
2012-1-25 Special https://youtu.be/AEQFFLn0NXY
2012-1-3 https://youtu.be/ewjWmylrJeE
SOFT Hearings Index
TOP
2011
2011-12-14 https://youtu.be/PDR3afuUdvA
2011-11-29 https://youtu.be/OBh1sCz3pRg
2011-10-25 https://youtu.be/CZM9OGF4pZI
2011-9-27 https://youtu.be/pw1kpRmowpE
2011-8-23 https://youtu.be/svaz63T0DAo
2011-7-26 https://youtu.be/kn6iggf1ZnM
2011-6-28 incomplete recording because of technical difficulties during hearing https://youtu.be/nnbd9SNrzwk
2011-5-26 https://youtu.be/SWcRC7OMaCs
2011-5-18 Special https://youtu.be/mS-xrJg1iZ0
2011-5-5 Special https://youtu.be/jZZxRIgisKA
2011-4-26 https://youtu.be/s9YdIyhI2q8
2011-4-21 Special https://youtu.be/nTFV-YPPEyU
2011-3-22 https://youtu.be/9r8kbjC24KQ
2011-3-17 Special https://youtu.be/XvudCw31zaw
2011-2-22 https://youtu.be/D0BB_Xc6eUY
2011-2-17 Special https://youtu.be/ilhseD1Khx4
2011-1-25 https://youtu.be/laGzyYU8NAg
2011-1-20 Special https://youtu.be/YNszmUgAHBo
2011-1-4 Special https://youtu.be/_Y3P3OaAXkA
2010
2010-11-30 Special https://youtu.be/f3qScnTiu7Y
2010-11-18 Special https://youtu.be/mPkw63wrfSk
2010-10-26 https://youtu.be/Mjt3X8-Hq4s
2010-9-28 https://youtu.be/DG14epk2lgk
2010-9-22 Special https://youtu.be/yUNpBJPUKxM
2010-9-7 Special https://youtu.be/AkI0GLFWRT8
2010-8-31 Special https://youtu.be/QjieRbL1nHc
2010-8-24 https://youtu.be/R0HHeHkOtMU
2010-7-27 https://youtu.be/CibaBjjWFcY
2010-7-21 Special https://youtu.be/9kcfX0ISeUo
2010-6-22 https://youtu.be/c01WQjBkYXQ
2010-6-1 Special https://youtu.be/EdxBDHNTiEg
2010-5-25 https://youtu.be/PMDzyTWxV_E
2010-5-18 Special https://youtu.be/E7qfF8BNLx8
2010-5-4 Special https://youtu.be/vwimt_c1WGw
2010-4-27 https://youtu.be/eCH-zsWYHP4
2010-4-20 Special https://youtu.be/le3hmLKcdkY
2010-4-6 Special https://youtu.be/X0r9p6ehRpk
2010-3-30 Special https://youtu.be/UB7lJUlYlf0
2010-3-23 https://youtu.be/B6yihPfwUO8
2010-2-23 https://youtu.be/4vFnCp66lP8
2010-1-26 https://youtu.be/YwkfdJgH-ac
2010-1-5 https://youtu.be/Dm4QH4tEcN4
2009
2009-12-1 https://youtu.be/Tca2eWX-zdk
2009-10-27 https://youtu.be/OO3wYhWNOYA
2009-9-22 https://youtu.be/g31Oq1N9Tyc
2009-8-25 https://youtu.be/0VHFdF5WpPs
2009-7-28 https://youtu.be/oI5uMwUi01s
2009-6-23 https://youtu.be/uqPp3Qy9FbM
2009-5-26 https://youtu.be/sEtTx5nQeYc
2009-4-28 https://youtu.be/gGbR1f0DsGQ
2009-3-24 https://youtu.be/ApZ2X2dIzXo
2009-2-24 https://youtu.be/NEPZQjeWm7c
2009-1-27 https://youtu.be/pyJjaoo9A2g
2009-1-6 Special https://youtu.be/WzdhRFDpuio
SOFT Hearings Index
TOP
Complaint Committee
20252025-1-21 Special https://youtu.be/z24IYFzkOJ4
2024
2024-12-17 https://youtu.be/WZs1TaBwPpk
2024-10-15 https://youtu.be/AfpBNEQDVSg
2024-9-17 https://youtu.be/uvEf6VoDZkI
2024-8-20 https://youtu.be/LEy-ABa421I
2024-7-16 https://youtu.be/8eSh712G1bc
2024-6-18 https://youtu.be/pQ0j17LOgOM
2024-4-23 https://youtu.be/OxjEWf4Z-qg
2024-3-19 https://youtu.be/799l68aHS3I
2024-2-20 https://youtu.be/zy3gLiOLIL4
2024-1-16 https://youtu.be/lZa-Ll6gFCI
2023
2023-11-21 https://youtu.be/lilN3k_tLcQ
2023-10-17 https://youtu.be/w6xee0GCI_I
2023-9-19 https://youtu.be/8UpUPSz0oIs
2023-8-15 https://youtu.be/jyn6G9izjYc
2023-7-18 https://youtu.be/mmQAAef9HSM
2023-6-20 https://youtu.be/qAXDKBUOwis
2023-4-18 https://youtu.be/sFTT4GOzGfs
2023-3-21 https://youtu.be/rm8d0nj05UY
2023-2-14 https://youtu.be/ImUlzgYWzJk
2023-1-17 https://youtu.be/JjIf3PNC4m8
2022
2022-12-20 https://youtu.be/mBGblDfY_CQ
2022-11-15 https://youtu.be/ampULQYI_64
2022-10-18 https://youtu.be/5yHO83YAEcQ
2022-9-20 https://youtu.be/k9fIUDzHxn4
2022-8-16 https://youtu.be/tLtg5fokiwo
2022-7-19 https://youtu.be/iByU9ligFI0
2022-6-21 https://youtu.be/zEPjGpxB3Iw
2022-5-17 https://youtu.be/wzo86fYgrY4
2022-4-19 https://youtu.be/Ggtvbem4VDo
2022-3-15 https://youtu.be/h1ey6NBWEPc
2022-2-15 https://youtu.be/y_AcFOQ22B8
2022-1-18 https://youtu.be/vAoEt5LVUNE
SOFT Hearings Index
TOP
2021
2021-12-21 https://youtu.be/VnBt64gca_o
2021-11-16 https://youtu.be/aZxpU3zursc
2021-10-19 https://youtu.be/83NJY2fOdl4
2021-9-21 https://youtu.be/5eizeBFw-68
2021-8-17 https://youtu.be/wAacfFk4zsc
2021-7-20 https://youtu.be/5dL5zObqX7s
2021-6-15 https://youtu.be/9VJYqh-bOhU
2021-5-18 https://youtu.be/8TMVEsuyEwo
2021-4-20 https://youtu.be/FvpG_WBuQxI
2021-3-16 https://youtu.be/3PBhyHEJdXc
2021-2-16 https://youtu.be/gSh72ULLEDo
2021-1-19 https://youtu.be/dvetHVdPEEY
2020
2020-12-15 https://youtu.be/gbB67EKlZnU
2020-12-1 Special https://youtu.be/M-XJO6x43RI
2020-11-18 https://youtu.be/vIcIsrtqTMA
2020-10-21 https://youtu.be/2xUg9XHwNSM
2020-9-15 https://youtu.be/lF6HUXysDN0
2019
2019-12-17 https://youtu.be/J-573aTt4Ec
2019-11-19 https://youtu.be/PTY_zmtlxDM
2019-10-15 https://youtu.be/EblppmazjKw
2019-9-17 https://youtu.be/zulqY2u1F2U
2019-8-20 https://youtu.be/N-AyRFumu7c
2019-7-23 https://youtu.be/1IIGovCtCJ8
2019-6-25 https://youtu.be/68T_8FREVVY
2019-5-28 https://youtu.be/8hE0739gBqQ
2019-4-23 https://youtu.be/X1yEsBTCJpM
2019-2-26 https://youtu.be/LjlUfEdk914
2019-1-22 https://youtu.be/BOUTJGYGXMs
SOFT Hearings Index
TOP
2018
2018-11-27 Partial Recording Reason Not Given https://youtu.be/jwA4WLjqzPE
2018-10-23 https://youtu.be/QJYdPsaehaQ
2018-9-25 https://youtu.be/wCFTrkFG3kw
2018-8-28 https://youtu.be/wmVGddb9voY
2018-6-26 https://youtu.be/cbr2VbOMMGA
2018-5-22 https://youtu.be/aE0sPFJtsBg
2018-4-24 https://youtu.be/lb0f8YW0slc
2018-3-27 https://youtu.be/-FIu5_1l1u8
2018-2-27 https://youtu.be/2UDVU2sQyi4
2018-1-23 https://youtu.be/R4CtD6kD6BA
2017
2017-11-28 https://youtu.be/hvEtgNMDoJU
2017-10-24 https://youtu.be/l-Hz3BWLWMI
2017-9-26 https://youtu.be/8U46itnPfsA
2017-8-22 https://youtu.be/G8Sc79ex_9E
2017-6-27 https://youtu.be/SDI0b5JBOe0
2017-5-23 https://youtu.be/R9XT9V6Ai3c
2017-4-25 https://youtu.be/bNpS07NcclE
2017-3-28 https://youtu.be/Gbdro05UfH0
2017-2-28 https://youtu.be/UjTRpE31Tys
2017-1-24 https://youtu.be/c1h61ymL4J4
2016
2016-12-21 https://youtu.be/a0CXadg6Rmw
2016-11-22 https://youtu.be/PKXQWK34pZU
2016-9-27 https://youtu.be/BEEubH-R0a8
2016-4-26 https://youtu.be/DU6Helq28cQ
SOFT Hearings Index
TOP
2015
2015-11-17 https://youtu.be/U3x9EyWShU4
2015-10-27 https://youtu.be/3ABM8Z6VzWI
2015-9-15 https://youtu.be/WjhjWkF9A7c
2015-7-21 https://youtu.be/Cd8BQLVYIbY
2015-6-16 https://youtu.be/CQroLN2jhtU
2015-4-21 https://youtu.be/ZTDJK4m1HN0
2015-3-17 https://youtu.be/ln_Tr-AD5zM
2015-2-17 https://youtu.be/u3wg4ydrjLo
2015-1-20 https://youtu.be/-kNNTyV2Bzk
2014
2014-11-10https://youtu.be/1rm5DZw4_Rk
2013
No Meetings
2012
No Meetings
2011
2011-7-12 https://youtu.be/MzboUyCIBmg
2011-6-14 https://youtu.be/UbwvdTjhp7Y
2011-5-10 https://youtu.be/xqXSlVHhXvY
2011-3-8 https://youtu.be/M_ew5x7Lowg
2011-2-8 https://youtu.be/Hf-YO-mPpAY
2011-1-11 https://youtu.be/4poXUp-qUHU
SOFT Hearings Index
TOP
2010
2010-11-9 https://youtu.be/E0BLTSh1Svg
2010-10-12 https://youtu.be/2pSSQGJicks
2010-9-14 https://youtu.be/iAfwQn-5R2o
2010-8-10 https://youtu.be/GzlAPn06PCU
2010-6-8 https://youtu.be/pf9K7h2gGZQ
2010-5-11 https://youtu.be/frHELdcUjbo
2010-4-13 https://youtu.be/QvQgtm8o9Uk
2010-3-09 https://youtu.be/9fJw-k4fzXQ
2009
2009-12-8 https://youtu.be/u3woVpykFkI
2009-11-10 https://youtu.be/yH49y_hZ1B4
2009-10-13 https://youtu.be/YWWiaAnF6E8
2009-8-11 https://youtu.be/KRL0Tgkjm_M
2009-7-14 https://youtu.be/T3P1NaqHEeE
2009-6-9 https://youtu.be/d9IrAq9k90Y
2009-5-12 https://youtu.be/_pZ9fpnCNwU
2009-4-14 https://youtu.be/rg-i2JV1iOI
2009-3-10 https://youtu.be/d406sJ8oRso
2009-2-10 https://youtu.be/6kJenPq9ayQ
2009-1-13 https://youtu.be/61JGKiS7WQg
SOFT Hearings Index
TOP
Compliance & Amendment Committee
20252025-1-30 Special https://youtu.be/rqbKFhqNpcE
2024
2024-10-22 https://youtu.be/HJ_23EcysnQ
2024-8-27 https://youtu.be/UlMm9eF4Ybs
2024-6-25 https://youtu.be/X3zSuZojKDI
2024-4-16 https://youtu.be/5EDmGgCT-iQ
2024-2-27 https://youtu.be/GiEkWKs2UVQ
2023
2023-10-24 https://youtu.be/ZaGQVEvv8Bc
2023-8-22 https://youtu.be/XeqQvANX1Pc
2023-6-27 https://youtu.be/DsCKXzWZDwc
2023-4-25 https://youtu.be/ZE8MyKNC964
2023-2-21 https://youtu.be/1u41PIs0-xo
2022
2022-12-27 https://youtu.be/uJXHNtJbMI4
2022-10-24 https://youtu.be/dA97dsrY2Rk
2022-8-23 https://youtu.be/Qf7nzmcRg5M
2022-6-28 https://youtu.be/NAl_c9wGAxI
2022-4-26 https://youtu.be/P0Aei99FadA
2022-2-22 https://youtu.be/IyCDKBb9yCA
2022-1-25 https://youtu.be/su_3J8ZQMrQ
2021
2021-11-23 https://youtu.be/IGk2Rd-U_pk
2021-10-26 https://youtu.be/b22-C2Wy7T0
2021-9-28 https://youtu.be/_1M4Kbyrdq4
2021-8-24 https://youtu.be/6pvqknKYYtQ
2021-7-27 https://youtu.be/amg44Lt2Zqs
2021-6-22 https://youtu.be/16OmU4HqU6w
2021-5-25 https://youtu.be/oUIXTQDMcBU
2021-4-27 https://youtu.be/IOBXG5maTtI
2021-2-23 https://youtu.be/hWw4QUoava4
2021-1-26 https://youtu.be/ULRIdaD_BPs
SOFT Hearings Index
TOP
2020
2020-12-22 https://youtu.be/qAJ1h4k2-BM
2020-11-24 https://youtu.be/PKfUseVaPO4
2020-10-27 https://youtu.be/qnAFMrKGHUg
2020-9-22 https://youtu.be/i5mD01ca7OA
2020-8-25 https://youtu.be/RsCXlPnAbHE
2020-7-28 https://youtu.be/bQ9YpeevvNE
2020-2-25 https://youtu.be/N3oAAmzkqKY
2020-1-28 https://youtu.be/EBaUKQyfy78
2019
2019-11-26 https://youtu.be/NoXvSz4V-CE
2019-9-24 https://youtu.be/FBVGONmHuIc
2019-8-27 https://youtu.be/aVBsFN8dcq4
2019-6-18 https://youtu.be/ZgYXnanIUds
2019-4-16 https://youtu.be/Y4TiRwl9ZcI
2018
2018-12-18 https://youtu.be/6oRM6PCLjPM
2018-9-18 https://youtu.be/N9xn8Rp4s7A
2018-7-17 https://youtu.be/b1QxIs1dP24
2018-5-15 https://youtu.be/hkP_FNfduX0
2018-3-20 https://youtu.be/vD3PM6r9xLM
2018-1-30 https://youtu.be/-rYWkLuDo2g
2017
2017-11-13 https://youtu.be/uTay7gMOgkM
2017-9-10 https://youtu.be/3U4hjDA_Isc
2017-7-10 https://youtu.be/5ZHyRnjc-p4
2017-5-30 https://youtu.be/P590xtgzPT0
2017-3-13 https://youtu.be/Zw_gCRbk-oA
2017-1-9 https://youtu.be/79NB_Htf1i0
SOFT Hearings Index
TOP
2016
2016-11-14 https://youtu.be/JMxyLfSfkeg
2016-9-12 https://youtu.be/Mf3mTdhHxaQ
2016-8-16 https://youtu.be/f8kz-ecXeW8
2016-6-21 https://youtu.be/d0BT_EOdgn4
2016-4-19 https://youtu.be/PkJI11rxbJ4
2016-2-16 https://youtu.be/BlxrZqTGLmI
2015
2015-12-15 https://youtu.be/PfcQyJd9nC4
2015-10-20 https://youtu.be/I86DYRaoBIA
2015-8-18 https://youtu.be/kCnkuXvclwY
2015-4-21 https://youtu.be/2UzvIztvpkQ
2015-2-17 https://youtu.be/u4ygF2xtlZc
2014
2014-12-16 https://youtu.be/gcIqXJMC6CY
2014-10-21 https://youtu.be/mJ3HX9DCdQg
2014-8-19 https://youtu.be/gJvz9snbmu0
2014-7-15 https://youtu.be/7nCVxgs1YHw
2014-6-17 https://youtu.be/YvmOrG5NmNM
2014-5-20 https://youtu.be/Lngdx4poLXY
2014-4-15 https://youtu.be/aZHYisEeNm0
2013
2013-12-17 https://youtu.be/--LTlSQXdgA
2013-11-10 https://youtu.be/Xl-Yl9U369A
2013-9-17 https://youtu.be/Rb4ZqyoGCXQ
2013-8-20 https://youtu.be/hfBm384hiGs
2013-7-16 https://youtu.be/mYWSNLeZ89o
2013-6-18 https://youtu.be/NKzIe_ln3MM
2013-4-16 https://youtu.be/4xuM0w1vYNM
2013-3-19 https://youtu.be/KakUrKjBj4E
2013-2-19 https://youtu.be/6dWHn1LL9ig
2013-1-15 https://youtu.be/eJv1wOIZ16I
SOFT Hearings Index
TOP
2012
2012-11-20 https://youtu.be/SjkKwxAj4Ho
2012-5-15 https://youtu.be/hwCuboukQLE
2012-4-17 https://youtu.be/mzA9ffNB_Pw
2012-3-29 Special https://youtu.be/AJUAJ3dcsh8
2012-3-20 https://youtu.be/xGY8H3Xqpfw
2012-2-21 https://youtu.be/Xxrt33WlJV8
2012-1-10 https://youtu.be/51z-F9XsVS0
2011
2011-12-13 https://youtu.be/1QsoMxwL_p8
2011-11-8 https://youtu.be/C5Ro3WcCOHo
2011-10-11 https://youtu.be/tVYbJVq-EMc
2011-9-13 https://youtu.be/YCYhOYOdsSs
2011-8-9 https://youtu.be/rtHmGKzVxNk
2011-7-12 https://youtu.be/L6t4DEEeUBc
2011-6-14 https://youtu.be/g3mTWN6L5hE
2011-5-10 https://youtu.be/gWc-gOqGhLM
2011-4-12 https://youtu.be/hipxEJDLfBY
2011-3-8 https://youtu.be/Qs4muJZBAVU
2011-2-8 https://youtu.be/2gNuOfzpquM
2011-1-11 https://youtu.be/Tn0rVfVa-O4
2010
2010-11-9 https://youtu.be/Axs7I8S4Ik8
2010-10-12 https://youtu.be/LWyLWfn35UY
2010-9-14 https://youtu.be/1Z7WEGmQfVY
2010-8-10 https://youtu.be/MaVHfLf-Tv0
2010-7-13 https://youtu.be/Q96Dj5ug500
2010-3-9 https://youtu.be/iQB_MlX_7Hk
2010-3-2 Special https://youtu.be/v4k8cEem44Q
2010-2-9 https://youtu.be/CBiXHf73lRM
2010-1-12 https://youtu.be/lli7G257Yy8
SOFT Hearings Index
TOP
2009
2009-12-8 https://youtu.be/vQSIvnJnAGk
2009-11-10 https://youtu.be/sVS18_bwcZg
2009-10-13 https://youtu.be/szpFb-y3wy4
2009-8-11 https://youtu.be/AplDJ02t0Bg
2009-7-14 https://youtu.be/uamu_fHKwtE
2009-6-9 https://youtu.be/ei__uutCTWE
2009-5-12 https://youtu.be/0co70_P6RhQ
2009-4-14 https://youtu.be/bNRXtbxZKv8
2009-1-21 https://youtu.be/L32OTCsEO28
SOFT Hearings Index
TOP
Education, Outreach & Training Committee
20252025-1-28 https://youtu.be/p-QNfSexTFg
2024
2024-5-8 https://youtu.be/C-I57n6RTgs
2024 1-23 https://youtu.be/Gipk_e4ef3Q
2023
2023-11-28 https://youtu.be/psK3pjV-swQ
2023-9-26 https://youtu.be/DN15NSeZ2XY
2023-5-23 https://youtu.be/eD5dmDm2mv4
2023-3-28 https://youtu.be/FX1a9hYuif4
2023-1-24 https://youtu.be/Raqjcolfi48
2022
2022-9-27 https://youtu.be/GzeMSCvPhrg
2022-7-26 https://youtu.be/Q9zxd6VwoXA
2022-5-24 https://youtu.be/BnrymVlc7xI
2022-3-8 https://youtu.be/09WjDaQdNQI
2022-1-11 https://youtu.be/UASKb2CR2_c
2021
2021-12-14 https://youtu.be/DHWMlwEbpLM
2021-11-9 https://youtu.be/MThgMI7oLcM
2021-10-12 https://youtu.be/pY1JctvIZQI
2021-9-14 https://youtu.be/oBDNtGUBQUI
2021-8-10 https://youtu.be/HLLyNOIx7AI
2021-7-13 https://youtu.be/PccgzrGNu3I
2021-6-8 https://youtu.be/EjPFjxIUMOI
2021-5-11 https://youtu.be/UGUuv1YjtPo
2021-3-21 https://youtu.be/91HqGw-GnRc
SOFT Hearings Index
TOP
2020 No Meetings
2019
2019-5-21 https://youtu.be/LCOCMV6PGzI
2019-1-15 https://youtu.be/UiBIzcf3IGc
2018
2018-10-16 https://youtu.be/vCcIQbdDb3I
2018-8-21 https://youtu.be/8Y1LMvkzpvk
2018-6-19 https://youtu.be/UpjoBP7aUPw
2018-4-17 https://youtu.be/w-KUbYMoubM
2018-2-20 https://youtu.be/wkKAWy480HQ
2017
2017-10-17 https://youtu.be/Kmwd2mUIuXI
2017-8-15 https://youtu.be/vdtryCzMZXQ
2017-6-20 https://youtu.be/gs1ilV_3Vy4
2017-4-18 https://youtu.be/ZOHsskOdEMk
2017-2-21 https://youtu.be/13EgUfveYqc
SOFT Hearings Index
TOP
2016
2016-12-20 https://youtu.be/QKfU3NlEAqs
2016-7-26 https://youtu.be/s0Tnnr-YLFQ
2016-5-9 https://youtu.be/HsMPSn1eia0
2016-1-11 https://youtu.be/H1JOOFNWWIk
2015
2015-11-9 https://youtu.be/wVDJLlO5UVo
2015-5-11 https://youtu.be/jmkL1swZBnc
2015-1-12 https://youtu.be/ti0Yn2EE4z4
2014
2014-11-10 https://youtu.be/9eU9hBObbOU
2014-9-8 https://youtu.be/e7UBGwKRt-s
2014-7-14 https://youtu.be/EpB39O3ahCU
2014-5-12 https://youtu.be/lmy6uUWf134
2014-4-14 https://youtu.be/lWL4XTnumGs
2014-2-10 https://youtu.be/51Cfz0bDZac
2014-1-13 https://youtu.be/nb2fmetlGvw
SOFT Hearings Index
TOP
2013
2013-12-9 https://youtu.be/B_jFEZacIoc
2013-11-26 https://youtu.be/fn_Aq_z-ORM
2013-9-16 https://youtu.be/Ciz0lFlQb2k
2013-6-25 https://youtu.be/U_ODlK2AnDc
2013-5-13 https://youtu.be/xtAc9-LJ3Wg
2013-4-29 https://youtu.be/gntjVtmC1Ho
2012
2012-12-13 https://youtu.be/9fk8UwMLp_Q
2012-5-10 https://youtu.be/v4JHatlrDFM
2012-2-9
2011
2011-10-13 https://youtu.be/BEa2pcdDRmM
2011-9-8 https://youtu.be/9Cg9x6mAcAw
2011-7-14 https://youtu.be/5KtgKKDkSu8
2011-6-9 https://youtu.be/I7hIkLwQI6A
2011-5-12 https://youtu.be/yOLx0jkZRfg
2011-4-11 https://youtu.be/DtURc4kMw0E
2011-3-10 https://youtu.be/Cl_fC01CuLk
2011-2-10 https://youtu.be/8SkP3Pvl1p4
2011-1-13 https://youtu.be/su6Zggn5gYY
SOFT Hearings Index
TOP
2010
2010-10-14 https://youtu.be/UVtQKcv6zS8
2010-8-12 https://youtu.be/-cP6YGKjMhc
2010-6-10 https://youtu.be/DXdednj91X4
2010-5-13 https://youtu.be/XX8m0FN3iCo
2010-4-8 https://youtu.be/kdJUEyOaIS0
2010-3-11 https://youtu.be/d3hSUDa3fJw
2010-2-11 https://youtu.be/NkDIoDLUTXc
2010-1-14 https://youtu.be/IFMe_WeO46Y
2009
2009-12-10 https://youtu.be/waryjcOkhrw
2009-11-12 https://youtu.be/Y6YZs0UoAGk
2009-10-8 https://youtu.be/BfAA9_JJCNg
2009-9-10 https://youtu.be/qaCdgEwX9ec
2009-8-13 https://youtu.be/vi0_2OV7sFs
2009-7-9 https://youtu.be/ti8wbZ-SOss
2009-6-11 https://youtu.be/s8NBBfj-ZIk
2009-5-14 https://youtu.be/xZNsoQ7K4hA
2009-4-9 https://youtu.be/xwUOFw6lDQI
2009-3-12 https://youtu.be/pvhPu85fgz8
2009-2-10 https://youtu.be/cLwkXFqsmTU
2009-1-8 https://youtu.be/v_2FRMy2VmY
SOFT Hearings Index
TOP
Rules Committee
2022
2022-10-11 https://youtu.be/r2U42uJ0M9E
2022-6-14 https://youtu.be/2TspV7Kv_2Q
2019
2019-9-24 https://youtu.be/L_FfkmJsFYQ
2019-6-18 https://youtu.be/lKJvCUi6B18
2019-3-26 https://youtu.be/vg3pSfnJ6dY
2018
2018-10-23 https://youtu.be/OQdkyhnIb5E
2017
2017-9-26 https://youtu.be/-qf1byfhDTc
2016
2016-10-25 https://youtu.be/eY2IDwEaa1g
2015
2015-7-21 https://youtu.be/hV9EBA5eaqs
2015-1-20 https://youtu.be/kdrPJqyds5g
2014
2014-9-16 https://youtu.be/VVqH9MNQoO8
2011
2011-3-10 https://youtu.be/Q-FkAoRnrw4
2009
2009-3-31 https://youtu.be/K_QOUVtZbNY
SOFT Hearings Index
TOP
Information Technology Committee
2022
2022-7-12 https://youtu.be/zRgAQmIPqgI
2022-3-22 https://youtu.be/tbCHw95M-Zk
2019
2019-12-19 https://youtu.be/loke4Zo2Ook
2019-10-22 https://youtu.be/LV-d0CGhXPQ
2017
2017-7-25 https://youtu.be/Z-dJI24HWlU
2017-5-23 https://youtu.be/VMxyue2yM54
2017-4-25 https://youtu.be/6uMCXcXm45o
2012
2012-2-10https://youtu.be/pt5s5nSVKgc
SOFT Hearings Index
TOP
SOTF Hearing "Transcripts" (Microsoft Teams Auto Transcripts) Links to Agenda, Minutes and Archived
**** For a time between January 2022 and May 2022, SOTF produced transcripts that could be acquired by public record. Then they stopped. Probably stopped because I was requesting and publishing the transcripts online. It was a city decision, probably the City Attorney’s Office. It was not based on time because Microsoft Teams, WebEx, and other meeting software can automatically provide a transcript if it is turned on. The City Attorney’s Office is probably worried about making audio/transcripts easily accessible, words can be used against the city and employees. City employees often are not truthful. SOTF making public records less accessible. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ This is kept on the website for public record access. Links to SOTF audio/transcripts can be found on YouTube in the prior section links or by https://www.youtube.com/@sfneighborhoods ****These are not legal transcripts. They allow for easier searches of audio recordings of hearings as they are time-stamped. They allow for word searches. All records in word document (.docx) format as received from SOTF. Click on the date of the committee or full SOTF to download the transcript.
You can make corrections to the transcripts by listening to the audio and using a text program. There are transcription programs. Example: Transcribe https://transcribe.wreally.com/transcriptions It has both auto-transcribe and self-transcription.
Audio links to each committee are below.
Agendas and Minutes links are provided below and Archive links to Agendas and Minutes which are really hard to find on the SOTF website.
Full Sunshine Ordinance Task Force
Audio Archive: Sunshine Ordinance Task Force: https://sfgov.org/sunshine/audio-archive-full-sotf2022
Wednesday, January 5, 2022 - 4:00pmSOTF "Retreat Meeting" Special Meeting. Tuesday, January 25, 2022 - 6:30pm
Wednesday, February 2, 2022 - 4:00pm
Wednesday, March 2, 2022 - 4:00pm
Wednesday, April 6, 2022 - 4:00pm
Wednesday, May 4, 2022 - 4:00pm
Older Archived Agendas and Minutes: https://sfgov.org/sunshine/ftp/meetingarchive/sunshine_full_task_force/meeting.aspx-page%3D5233%26subpage%3D2011.html
Complaint Committee
Audio Archive: Complaint Committee: https://sfgov.org/sunshine/audio-archive-committees2022
Tuesday, January 18, 2022 - 5:30pmTuesday, February 15, 2022 - 5:30pm
Tuesday, March 15, 2022 - 5:30pm
Tuesday, April 19, 2022 - 5:30pm
Older Archived Agendas and Minutes: https://sfgov.org/sunshine/ftp/meetingarchive/sunshine_complaint_committee/meeting.aspx-page%3D4954%26subpage%3D2011.html
Compliance & Amendments Committee
Audio Archive: Compliance & Amendments Committee: http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view_id=98#compliance2022
Tuesday, January 25, 2022 - 4:30pmTuesday, February 22, 2022 - 4:30pm
Cancelled - Tuesday, March 22, 2022 - 4:30pm
Tuesday, April 27, 2022 - 4:30pm
Older Archived Agendas and Minutes: https://sfgov.org/sunshine/ftp/meetingarchive/sunshine_compliance_and_amendments/meeting.aspx-page%3D4465%26subpage%3D2011.html
Education Outreach and Training Committee
Audio Archive: Education Outreach and Training Committee: http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view_id=98#education2022
Tuesday, January 11, 2022 - 5:30pmCancelled - Tuesday, February 8, 2022 - 5:30pm
Tuesday, March 8, 2022 - 5:30pm
Cancelled - Tuesday, April 12, 2022 - 5:30pm
Older Archived Agendas and Minutes: https://sfgov.org/sunshine/ftp/meetingarchive/sunshine_edu_outreach_training/meeting.aspx-page%3D4759%26subpage%3D2011.html
Information Technology Committee (also known as Technology Committee)
Audio Archive: Information Technology Committee: http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view_id=98#technologyAgenda and Minutes: https://sfgov.org/sunshine/meetings/26
Older Archived Agendas and Minutes: None
Rules Committee
Audio Archive: Rules Committee: http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view_id=98#rules2022
None so farOlder Archived Agendas and Minutes: https://sfgov.org/sunshine/ftp/meetingarchive/sunshine_rules_committee/meeting.aspx-page%3D4660%26subpage%3D2011.html
Special or Ad Hoc Committee (also known as Ad Hoc Committee)
Audio Archive: Special or Ad Hoc Committee: http://sanfrancisco.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view_id=98#adhoc2022
None so farOlder Archived Agendas and Minutes: https://sfgov.org/sunshine/sites/default/files/ftp/meetingarchive/BOS-Sunshine-AdHoc/meeting.aspx-page%3D5187%26subpage%3D2011.html
TOP